![]() the spectrum of several synths is limited (eg, Harmless and Harmor do not rise above 17kHz), the hard limit at the output of the drumpad / drumaxx (which requires to use a compressor or a designer designer to have attacks of great amplitude), and therefore the impossibility to save synth presets with their effects (it is necessary to save the preset of synth + save the preset of the channel of the mixer containing the effects. the impossibility of adding effects directly to synths, Personally, with FL, I'm disappointed with: Each DAW has its own specificities, strengths and weaknesses. But I think it's normal, LMMS is not FL, and vice versa. Regarding FL, I was also rather disappointed. I think I'll test out Ableton, I've heard that's drastically different.Īnyway, I'd just like to say to the LMMS developers: You did a pretty dang FANTASTIC job! I only tried FL-Studio because people told me it was similar to LMMS. I watched an hour tutorial, I don't think I'm missing anything. Makes me wonder how it's so popular, and why more people aren't using LMMS. ![]() I can barely have two instruments loaded without the program freaking out. Imagine ONLY having B/B Editors and Automation tracks, that's it. I've done a lot of research to make sure that I wasn't missing some feature or something, but it turns out LMMS is actually better designed in that respect. It looks AMAZING, but it doesn't work amazing. It seems to have some better effects and instruments, but I didn't see anything nearly as useful as ZynAddSubFX.Īlso, its design (with composing the actual song, with the notes and stuff) sucks compared to LMMS. either isn't as good as people make it out to be, or I haven't spent enough time with it. I have not bought FL-Studio yet, and I just got the Demo Version working today. Then the time issue, how does fruity loops fix that ? If I would pay for my daw, I would pick cubase or albeton. ![]() Good luck, but few things makes me wonder. If any of you out there are crazy enough, and just a bit stupid like me, you may be able to become the first professional composer to only use free software. Once I become a professional, I may decide to make a song using only free software, to show the world that it can be done.īut, I still won't be a free-software composer. I'll still be using LMMS for collaborations and such, but my main DAW will be FL-Studio. ![]() I really do not want to, but I've run out of options. If I had another two or so years, I'd make it. But, the amount of skills I was gaining was rounding off at a logarithmic curve. I've been *so close* to becoming professional, for such a long time. I think it's actually around 11000 hours. I've gone over three years doing this, and at least 9000 hours on it. Up until this point, I've never even looked at a piece of software that wasn't open source. If I get a job, then layered on top of school and my 8800 square foot garden that my dad insists must be perfect, I'd barely even have time to sleep, let alone make music. My parents said that if I didn't pull together $10000 by the year 2020, I'd be kicked out of the house, with no resources whatsoever.Īdditionally, they said they'd force me to get a job doing manual labor if I don't start pulling in money by next summer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |